am i the only one who shorted the Uniswap fee switch here? why:
• no mention of fees earned directed to buybacks, only forward fees. they cover rewarding existing holders with retroactive burn only.
• adding 5bps at protocol layer changes the routing science and reduces volume
• removing frontend fees which were 3x-5x the new 5bps protocol fee may not mean more revenue imo
• LPs now get paid less 20-25% less as protocol fee is intro'ed. will liquidity stick around?
• basically been losing market share on all chains that matter
• see relative math with Jupiter as a comp where flywheel has been active
im sure gauntlet and uniswap did the math though. from my perspective, 5bps feels like the highest they could go at a protocol level without getting rekt on flows/revs. else why wouldn't they have gone higher? why didn't uniswap show their homework (the math) in the governance post?
FWIW i paired my UNI short with a long on JUP. awaiting threadooors and number crunchers to punt me out of the trade.
8,169
29
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

