If crypto drifts lower it will not be because of the agencies who are no longer participating thru channels broken by 10/10 but by-asset crosswinds elsewhere (surprising T1 TCO sell, recession, AI CAPEX boom, etc)
$50B: the total amount of visible spot flow from ETF and TCos traceable to BTC and ETH since the start of July (so last 3 months). It is your call to evaluate how many degrees removed / connected that is to crypto specific firms (allocators and/or facilitators)
The questions I have instead are:
a) have vulnerable firms sold and,
b) if not, can they / will they sell here & what are their bottlenecks. That’s it
Part of advancing past the 4Y cycle notion is evolving beyond the traditionalists. The cleanest way of doing so is showing that their participation is no longer needed
The incentive to be bearish here is high stakes. Falling here helps enforce 4Y cycle theory and the lifeline that market fractals may still be uncharged
Continuation upward circumvents this and makes this school of thought (TA, “signals” extinct), comprising edge erasure
Look at the ppl who are bearish vs those who are not. You can classify them by class/year joining CT (with some small exceptions, like those who are just bearish 24/7)
1.5万
66
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。