Neobanks and RWAs will be the bubble of the next cycle. These consumer fintech app, due to branding power, think they can get away without PoR (see crypto[.]com) They will race to the bottom with each taking increasing risks.
Another Difficult Personal Decision We’ve made the difficult personal decision…to stay miles away from every FAKE stablecoins out there and continue trading on @HyperliquidX, where we can literally reverse exposure in minutes with minimal market impact. 🤣 Not because @PacmanBlur, @SmokeyTheBera, or @pauliepunt’s ex–best friend 🤣have been calling this BS out — but because if most of your assets sit off-chain, you should NOT be called a stablecoin, and you definitely shouldn’t be looping leverage on top of something that is illiquid by definition. @pythianism called it “RWA looping” (conveniently aligned with @hiFramework’s latest investments — we understand it’s easy to sell LPs on a pivot to AI infra during AI-mania kek), but if Buffett called derivatives WMD back in 2008, then looping on illiquid assets with dubious transparency and spreads that clearly can’t outlast on-chain borrow costs is just the tokenized version of WMD. ⸻ Why D2 Doesn’t Touch That Stuff At D2, we made very conservative design choices since December 2023, and we never marketed our stablecoin-deposit strategy as a “stablecoin.” Even without a single down epoch (yet 🙏💚), calling it that would have been misleading — that’s exactly why we named it ETH++ and now HYPE++, so users wouldn’t get confused. Our triple-audited architecture guarantees that all users can withdraw at the same time, under the same conditions, during the withdrawal/deposit window: This is why even @StreamDefi could withdraw their entire position in one transaction without affecting any other user. (Receipts attached 👇) And — broken clock or not, right twice a day 🤣 — Caleb invested in both d2HYPE and HYPE++, and made money in both. ⸻ With the Premise (as @GearboxProtocol correctly pointed out) That Looping is Broken…Curious to See How Others Try to Fix It I’m genuinely curious how @sonyasunkim, @3f_romeo, @3FLabs @MikeIppolito_ try to solve this fundamental mismatch, as they discussed on @thebellcurvepod: But when your last hedge-fund employer is — the largest private lender in Asia with $50B AUM — forgive us for being skeptical that it’s “good” to tokenize and loop leverage on private credit, or anything with the liquidity profile of private credit. Private credit is a lawyers-and-paranoid-people game. You negotiate covenants line-by-line, and you need a very specific skillset — the one my ex-colleagues at had. That skillset is nothing like what Vance learned at Framework. Sorry, mate. VC is a home-run business.Private credit is precision-risk management. And definitely completely different than the ‘skill set’ @Re7Labs @MEVCapital @hyperithm @TelosConsilium showed ( or lack of, kek) ⸻ And One Last Funny Note… Sonia referenced @FasanaraDigital MF1as an example of illiquid private credit ( we like the flowcharts 💚) The stablecoin that Stream Finance used to repay the loan against MF1? It came from their withdrawal of HYPE++ in one transaction, without any impact on other users. So to anyone exposed to @StreamDefi: you’re welcome. 💚 Hyperliquid
2,43 mil
1
El contenido de esta página lo proporcionan terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es el autor de los artículos citados y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo vinculado para obtener más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. El holding de activos digitales, incluyendo stablecoins y NFT, implican un alto grado de riesgo y pueden fluctuar en gran medida. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti a la luz de tu situación financiera.