AI demand collided with physical limits. The next moat is control of land, power, water, and grid access. Firms with locked-in megawatts hold a stronger position than companies shipping GPUs. Cheap, firm power sets the pace of the entire buildout. The players who already secured those electrons now sit on assets that matter more than their core businesses.
A surprising mix of legacy industries hold this advantage. Aluminum smelters with subsidized hydropower. Crypto miners with long-term PPAs in Texas. Hydrogen producers with public power allocations. Old industrial campuses with behind-the-meter generation. These firms run weak or volatile businesses, but they hold premium power rights. For many, the returns from selling or repurposing those megawatts for AI data centers beat the economics of continuing the legacy product lines.
More candidates sit in the shadows. Pulp and paper mills with large biomass or gas co-gen units. Fertilizer and chemical plants with long-term Gulf Coast power contracts. Silicon metal and ferroalloy producers with dedicated hydro or gas supply. Older steel operations with captive power. These sites consume huge amounts of energy and often struggle to earn their cost of capital. Their power access is the real prize. As AI buildout pressure grows, these overlooked operators may find their grid connections valued far above their underlying businesses.
When do we start buying #IP, #AA, #CF, #LYB, #DOW, etc. as AI plays because its more profitable to sell your power to an AI Hyperscaler than to make your core product?
7,714
31
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

